Industrial and artisan processing compared
The same chain at two scales, optimising for opposite things. Neither is a degraded version of the other.
Industrial and craft chocolate follow the same sixteen steps, and differ in what each step is tuned for.
Industrial production optimises consistency. Beans are blended to average out variation, roast profiles are held constant, conching is long, and the specification is the same across years and continents. Achieving that from agricultural input that varies by farm and harvest is a genuine technical accomplishment, and it is why an industrial bar tastes identical everywhere.
Craft production optimises distinctiveness. Single lots, per-lot roast profiles, shorter conching to preserve character. The same control that allows a remarkable bar allows a badly judged one, and micro-scale brings its own constraints — winnowing is inefficient, refining is slow, and batch-to-batch consistency is genuinely hard.
The honest summary is that they are different objectives, and most criticism in either direction is really a criticism of the other's objective.
What it does
Describes how the same production chain is tuned differently at different scales, rather than a distinct technique.
Why it matters
Most consumer writing treats craft as better and industrial as degraded. They optimise for different things, and knowing which you want is more useful than a ranking.
- Optional?
- A comparison record rather than a step in the chain.
Commonly misunderstood
That industrial chocolate is craft chocolate done carelessly. It is a different objective pursued with considerable technical competence.
Related
Covered in
- Industrial vs craft processThe record comparing the two production models stage by stage.
Sources
- ChocolateHQ editorial synthesis — ChocolateHQ(citation identity confirmed; passage not re-read)
- The Science of Chocolate — Royal Society of Chemistry(citation identity confirmed; passage not re-read)